Rayleigh Town Council Misses Out on Section 106 Money?

November 27, 2021 in News

I've recently been speaking with other Town and Parish Councillors around the country about section 106 (s106) payments from developers to "develop facilities to support the additional residents living in the community" where they have had additional housing built. What strikes me as odd is that there has never been any mention of this at Rayleigh Town Council and furthermore, the Districts Portfolio Holder for Planning is actually a Town Councillor!!!

SECTION 106 AGREEMENT
Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 allows a Local Planning Authority (LPA) to
enter into a legally-binding agreement or planning obligation with a landowner as part of the granting of planning permission. The obligation is termed a “section 106 agreement”.
Developers are charged a contribution by the LPA depending on the size and number of dwellings
being built. This money is used to develop facilities to support the additional residents living in the
community.
These agreements aim to address issues that are necessary to make a development acceptable in
planning terms. They can be used to support the provision of services and infrastructure, such as
highways, recreational facilities, health and affordable housing.
Local planning authorities should work with local councils to deliver community benefits and improvements in the parish, ward, town or area relating to the location of the development from which the contribution was received.

I will admit this has only recently come to light for me and I will hold my hands up and say in the 5 years I have been a member of the Council, I haven't raised this issue. I have now though! At the budget meeting, I have questioned why Rayleigh Town Council hasn't been applying for s106 payments to develop the facilities of the town - the room was silent. This is surely a dereliction of duty to our residents?

I have now asked the District Council to formalise the process for Town and Parishes to negotiate s106 payments for their areas.

You might also be interest in these posts...

Time To Incentivise The Switch To Electric For Taxis In Rayleigh and Rochford?

You may have read recently about the EV charging points being installed for Taxis in Rayleigh and Rochford. But have we missed a trick if we are deadly serious about making this change work? I wonder should we help motivate the taxi operators to make the switch sooner by reducing their licencing costs for those

Read More

Has the Congestion Closed Rayleigh For Businesses?

I’ve sent the Portfolio Holder for Enterprise an email to find out what he intends to do about the damaging effects of Essex County Council’s bad planning and Rochford District Council’s desire to build without the infrastructure in place. From: Cllr James Newport Subject: Congestion and impact on our local economy and residentsDate: 5 September 2019 at 08:15:49

Read More

Lighting Our Footpaths

What do residents think about installing lighting along this stretch of Sweyne Park bridle track? Basically from the top of Victoria Avenue to Priory Chase? Let me know in the comment below please or if there are other footpaths you think where lighting could be added or improved.

Read More

About the author 

James Newport

Essex County Councillor for Rayleigh North, Rochford District Councillor for Downhall & Rawreth and Rayleigh Town Councillor for Sweyne.